the balcony fool

serious film discussion. seriously.

Archive for April, 2006

REVIEW: Silent Hill

Posted by Paul Christian Glenn on April 29, 2006

silenthillhead

Director: Christophe Gans
Starring: Radha Mitchell, Sean Bean, Laurie Holden
Trailer: www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/silenthill

Rated R for strong horror violence and gore, disturbing images and some language.

Silent Hill is the best possible movie that can be wrung from a video game. That is both the good and the bad news.

Hollywood has been foisting video game based movies on the world for over a decade now, and it’s sort of incredible that anyone still thinks it’s a good idea. While a few have been profitable, none are good films, and most are the sort of embarrassing dreck that nobody wants on the ol’ resume. Still, at the time of this writing, I know of at least four more that are either in development or production. I guess we mustn’t underestimate the depths to which Hollywood will sink to avoid coming up with an original idea. Ah, but I’ve wandered off topic.

silenthill1.jpgI’ve not played the Silent Hill games (there are five), so I can’t speak to the faithfulness of the movie adaptation, but I can say that the film unfolds just like a video game. That is, there’s an intriguing setup, an apocalyptic conclusion, and a lot of repetitive running around in between. (Come to think of it, it’s remarkable how many big Hollywood flicks have become just like that.) The movie looks terrific and delivers a few genuinely creepy moments, but the premise simply doesn’t hold up for two hours and more.

Nine-year-old Sharon Da Silva (Jodelle Ferland) suffers from memory lapses and draws disturbing pictures of people in torment (a sure sign that she’s either possessed by a devil or has been watching other horror movies on cable). If that weren’t enough, she’s recently started muttering “Silent Hill” while sleepwalking. Sharon’s mother Rose (Radha Mitchell) Googles “Silent Hill” and discovers that it’s a ghost town in West Virginia, abandoned thirty years ago after underground fires consumed or poisoned most of the residents. Rose decides, as any mother would, to take little Sharon to the site of the tragedy. Her husband Chris (Sean Bean) is against the idea, but Rose’s motherly intuition tells her if she doesn’t do this, there won’t be a movie.

silenthill2So Rose all but kidnaps little Sharon and heads for Silent Hill. Along the way she raises the ire of an impossibly beautiful motorcycle cop named Cybil, and after a high speed chase they all crash on the outskirts of the titular town. Rose is knocked unconscious, and when she comes to, little Sharon is gone. Much to their horror, Rose and Cybil discover that Silent Hill is no ordinary ghost town. It is home to a Strange and Unspeakable Evil. Unfortunately, little Sharon is not only tormented by the Evil, but just might have something to do with its Unspeakableness in the first place.

Meanwhile, Rose’s husband Chris discovers what his wife has done. He follows her to West Virginia and does a lot of whining while a mysterious detective tries to prevent him from learning anything about Silent Hill’s mysterious past.

It’s an intriguing setup, but from there the story cruises into a holding pattern. Rose and Cybil run from one redundant scene to the next, meeting assorted apparitions along the way. The sets are marvelous, the special effects are well-done, and the demons are wonderfully creative. Two scenes in particular gave me the chills; one involves a dead janitor in dire need of a chiropracter, and the other features a medieval torturer with some kind of toaster on his head.

silenthill3The third act is ushered in by that most unfortunate of devices: an all-knowing character appears and explains everything in excruciating detail. The back-story is unbelievably complex (even fans of the game can’t agree on what, exactly, the story is), and the scene carries on forever. The only thing not explained is why it took so long for the explicator to show up. Armed with the knowledge they need, Rose and Cybil scream, sweat and swagger their way to the final showdown, an extravaganza of blood and mayhem.

The problem with video game adaptations is fundamental. Games offer an immersive experience, films offer a vicarious one. A good adaptation would remain true to the source material, a good film would necessarily diverge. Even if you overlook Silent Hill’s laughable dialogue, unrealistic motivation and muddled plot, the film can’t overcome it’s most basic problem: it was written for the Playstation.

Posted in Reviews | 1 Comment »

REVIEW: Scary Movie 4

Posted by Paul Christian Glenn on April 20, 2006

Scary Movie Head

Director: David Zucker
Starring: Anna Faris, Craig Bierko, Regina Hall

Rated PG-13 for crude and sexual humor throughout, some comic violence and language.

scary movie 1The Scary Movie films have been an inexplicable box-office juggernaut, reaping hundreds of millions of dollars despite the fact that they’ve exhibited not a shred of ingenuity, originality or, well, humor. Where old-school spoof flicks like Airplane!, The Naked Gun and Hot Shots took a recognizable film genre and milked it for every gag possible, the Scary Movie films have devolved into a scattershot collection of slapstick sketches connected loosely (if at all) by recurring characters. The upshot is that The Naked Gun’s gags are funny because they lampoon characteristics inherent to the cop genre, while Scary Movie’s gags are not funny, because they exist entirely without context. We’re supposed to laugh simply because we recognize the setup (“Oh, look–this scene is like War of the Worlds! Get it?”)

This fourth installment takes shots at Saw, The Village, The Grudge, Million Dollar Baby, War of the Worlds, Dark Water, Hustle & Flow, Harry Potter and, of all things, Brokeback Mountain. The comedy, predictably, aims for the lowest common denominator. In fact, the image at the head of this review is a perfect visual summary of what you can expect from this flick.

scary movie 3The cast, bless their hearts, is game enough. Craig Bierko in particular shows glints of comic timing that could have elevated this romp if the script had allowed more room for genuine humor. (Bierko gets the best line in the film: “That does sound like a face.”) Series vet Anna Faris remains as bland and uninspired as she was in the first three outings. Still, movies like this don’t live or die by their on-screen talent, and the utlimate failure belongs to director David Zucker, whose ham-fisted set-ups and and clumsy production values cripple nearly all the sight gags.

scary movie 2All this is especially woeful because Zucker is the same man who brought us Airplane!, The Naked Gun and Top Secret. While those films took affectionate jabs at their straight counterparts, Scary Movie is just cynical and lazy filmmaking. According to IMDB, Zucker currently has a superhero spoof in pre-production. That’s a genre ripe for a good parody (Blankman and Leonard Part 6 didn’t cut it), and we can only hope that this once-great comic director remembers what made his early films such a delight.

Posted in Reviews | Leave a Comment »